You are right.  It is a preliminary and is not a 
certification.  My guess is the purpose is to either confuse people into 
believe they are a CCIE or try to get the most "credibility" that you can 
get by without outright lying.  (at least they are not saying they ARE
ccies).
         Depends on the "clue" level of the hiring manager.  Most people do 
not know how Cisco's Certification structure goes, and may very well 
believe the CCIE Written is a legitimate certification.  This is going to 
wildly vary depending on the location and intelligence of the hiring 
managers across the world.
         Is it normal practice to try to overextend what you know, of 
course.  Is it a practice I condone or do myself?  No.
         However, I never did feel people who carassed routers and called 
TAC for every single trivial problem for 5 years have "5 years of 
experience in the networking field."  Do people still do it?  Yes.  Will 
they still be doing it even after I have turned into worm food.  Most 
likely yes.  It will be a different context, but people will be 
overextending what they claim to know and their abilities all the time.

At 03:24 PM 1/7/02 -0500, juno vtv wrote:
>I have noticed that people who have passed their CCIE written exam will put
>CCIE Written under their name.
>
>I would like to know why?
>
>I personally don't believe that the written exam is a certification but more
>of a preliminary. What is the purpose of putting CCIE written after your
>signature?
>
>Hiring managers:  What are your thoughts when you see a resume with CCIE
>written on there?  Is that misleading?
>
>I am asking this out of curiosity.  I do not know if this is a normal
>practice or not.
>
>I would like see people's thoughts on this.
>
>-junovtv
-Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31203&t=31196
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to