I was wondering if anyone knew whether or not a rotary nat would forward established communications to the same server or whether it would round robin all packets being translated. How about Checkpoint? Will that keep established communications going to the same server? Anybody?
Thanks! Frank -----Original Message----- From: Dion, Thierry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Runts and Giants [7:32281] sorry for rewritting but the last mail didn't work see the link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html#fifth -----Message d'origine----- De : Dion, Thierry Envoyi : jeudi 17 janvier 2002 13:42 @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: Runts and Giants [7:32281] -----Message d'origine----- De : Pieter Jordaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyi : jeudi 17 janvier 2002 12:03 @ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Runts and Giants [7:32281] Hi I have a cisco 2924 switch connected to a 6509, the port is configured as a trunk. when I use ISL encaptulation between the switches I get a lot of giant frames, and when I use dot1q I get a lot of runts. If I replace the switch with a 2950 (which only supports dot1q) I dont get any runts or giants and all works well. I am experiencing this behaviour on 30 + 2900XL switches but not on any of my 2950's Any Idea what could be happening here? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32305&t=32305 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
