In your running config do you have a statement like 'ip route 192.168.192.7 255.255.255.255 dialer 1'
? The interface, while logical as opposed to physical, acts as any other interface. And the rule that a static route to an interface is considered to be directly connected still applies. Andy Barkl wrote: > > I have my ISPs internal route showing as a connected route in > my local route > table. There is no exchange of dynamic routes or static. I am > not using them > for DHCP. > They can't explain it either but I am hoping someone here has > seen this > before. > > Output listed below. > > Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0 > > 192.168.192.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets > C 192.168.192.7 is directly connected, Dialer1 ((suspect > route)) > 208.xxx.xxx.xxx/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets > C 208.xxx.xxx.xxx is directly connected, Dialer1 > C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Dialer1 > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32644&t=32640 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
