That is a common problem with 3Com NICs you can try upgrading the dirvers
witch sometimes helps but hardsetting speed and duplex to 100/full on both
sides is you best bet.


""Bill Carter""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have been seeing a lot of problems with 3COM NIC's  If the switch is
> forced 100/full and the NIC is auto we get a lot of errors, if NIC is
forced
> 100/Full errors go away.  If Switch and 3Com NIC left to auto switch will
> come up 100/full and NIC 100/half.
>
> You have to make sure the NIC is also forced.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Michael Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Errors on Ethernet Ports on 6500?!?!?! [7:32853]
>
>
> This is wild stuff, so I thought I'd run it by GroupStudy to see if anyone
> had seen this before or knew what caused it.
>
> We're currently migrating connections from a 5513+RSM to a new
> 6509+Sup2/MSFC2.  There were three ethernet connections, that upon being
> moved from the 5500 to the 6500, starting showing input errors and CRC
> errors.  When these connections were moved, the port on the 6500 was
> configured identically to the same port on the 5500 as far as speed,
duplex,
> VLAN assignment, and spanning tree settings.
>
> These same devices (same patch cables and all) created no errors on the
5500
> whatsoever.
>
> Here's the kicker:  When we went back and changed the port speed/duplex to
> "auto" on the 6500, it negociated the same speed/duplex settings we had
> forced, but now there were no more errors.  (i.e. a server set for
100-Full,
> that was plugged into a switchport on the 5500 forced to 100-Full was
fine,
> but plugged into a port on the 6500 forced to 100-Full caused errors, and
> plugged into the exact same 6500 port set for "auto" speed/duplex had no
> errors.)
>
> Any ideas on why letting the switch detect settings caused no errors while
> forcing it to those same settings causes errors?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33731&t=32853
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to