Thanks folks Now I see, Unless cisco have a New version that support the failover working only with the fastethernet link, there's no cable as long as I need to make this possible.
Thanks for all your ideas. ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen May To: Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: Re: PIX's statefull failover, but in diferent locations [7: [7:35135] > Seems to me it would slow down the PIX big time if the failover link were > slow. I have no idea what speed it runs. It's run from the 10/100 port but > with the pinouts I have no idea what it requires. If there are tons of > translations going on then to remain stateful it must send all of that info > to the other PIX in real-time. > > Although I do see the practicality in having this feature & would love to > see it. Failover spanning more than one site is the only true failover to > survive fires or some other isolated natural disaster. > > Which raises another question though....could this data be sniffed for > anything of value if it's only info to keep it stateful? Anybody know > what's in that data stream exactly? > > Allen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Ramsey" > To: > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 1:50 PM > Subject: Re: PIX's statefull failover, but in diferent locations [7: > [7:35130] > > > > well...earlier in the list it had been said that cisco was implementing > this > > into their newer code... (so failover was across ethernet instead of > > failover goign through serial) I'm not sure if it has been implemented as > a > > solid feature or if it is still in beta... (if it even exists) > > > > the problem is that the two firewalls use the serial connection to xfer > > config data and a separate failover link to monitor uptime (ethernet).... > > so...the answer is this: > > > > If you are runnign the latest a 'greatest' from cisco and they have indeed > > implemented complete ethernet failover, then go check out their TAC and > see > > if it is capable of going across the wan.... otherwise, the answer is no > > because the serial cable is only a few feet in length... :) > > > > NOW... it has been theorized that you could use a term server for this > > connection (and run the conenction across the WAN) but never been > tested.. > > :) > > > > Patrick Ramsey > > Sr. Network Engineer > > WellStar Health Systems > > 770.956.6338 > > > > >>> "Allen May" 02/11/02 02:04PM >>> > > It's not a straight through RJ45 cable running between the 2 so I doubt a > > repeater would work for that. What are you trying to accomplish? Is it > > anything a couple of routers could handle with the PIX's running behind > > them? > > > > Allen > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Francisco Quiroz Collazo" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:07 PM > > Subject: PIX's statefull failover, but in diferent locations [7:35112] > > > > > > > Have ever any of you configure a statefull failover between two pix's > > > separated by a wan. I mean, it is possible this configuration if those > > pix4s > > > are in different facilities, 20 Km between them? > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Francisco Quiroz > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files > transmitted with it may contain confidential and > > /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, > > Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to > whom > > addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be > > privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If > > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > > notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or > > copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may > > subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this > > email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete > this > > email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. > > > > ================================================================ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35154&t=35154 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]