Just speculating on my own question: Could it be because Cisco routers have a built-in NT2, so they are providing
both S and T interfaces? (Even though the S interface do not connect to anything!) Pierre-Alex -----Original Message----- From: Pierre-Alex GUANEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:53 PM To: Cisco Subject: ISDN T Stupid question that is bugging me .... Why are Cisco native ISDN interfaces labeled with S/T rather than T? Cisco routers do not provide an interface for other capable ISDN devices .... You plug the Ethernet cable to the NT1. So shouldn't the interface called a T? Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35446&t=35446 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
