The funniest thing about boson, is when they list the same answer 2 or 3 times. But list only one of them as right, ha hahha! Is it like this on the real test? I would panic!
-----Original Message----- From: Joshua Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Review of Boson CCIE Security Pre-Qualification Test # 1 [7:35942] Like I said before, BOSON is heralded for some strange reason, I think that they are terrible. The absolute best thing you can do in the absence of hands on is read that book 3 times. Your benefits are two fold. You get to be a doggone good reader and you might actually LEARN something. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Patrick Bass Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Review of Boson CCIE Security Pre-Qualification Test # 1 [7:35932] There are a lot of errors in this exam. Some of it is just being plain wrong, more of it is "data-entry" type errors. The author has always written me back when I notify him of an error; and this has been, unfortunately, quite often. Also, one thing I do not like at all is the questions that have four answers, and it says "Select the 4 best answers" or whatever. How hard would it have been to put a couple of extra answers in these questions to at least making it challenging? Finally, some of the web-links cited in the answers have nothing to do with the question; perhaps this are more of the "data-entry" errors? For $39 dollars, its hard to go wrong... but I've seen Boson put out much better quality stuff before. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35967&t=35967 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]