Not enought customers have asked for that feature yet. :) Was RFC 1149 the precursor to wireless?
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey, are you ever going to upgrade to RFC 2549 compliance? If you > haven't already, you're behind the times by about three years! :-) > > John > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 2/22/02 11:43:33 AM > >>> > I believe you need something like > > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www > > you have something that permits IP protocol numbers I think. Like 6 > is > tcp, 17 is udp, 9 is igrp, etc.. > > etc... > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > ""NetEng"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Why is this simple task beating me? > > > > I have a router with 2eth. that separates my lab from the corporate > network. > > I would like web/ftp/telnet access from the lab to the world and > back. I > > created an access list and applied it to my lab's ethernet int. This > is > the > > list. Am I missing something? > > > > access-list 101 permit 80 any any > > access-list 101 permit 21 any any > > access-list 101 permit 23 any any > > access-list 101 permit 53 any any > > access-list 101 permit icmp any any > > > > ip access-group 101 out (on ethernet of lab side) > > > > TIA. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36275&t=36240 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
