I've done lot's of LLQ but never with FR.  My bet however, would be than you
can do LLQ on the int, for FRTS, but not both.

Mike

-------------------
Mike Bernico                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Illinois Century Network      http://www.illinois.net
(217) 557-6555


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Manuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: LLQ Configuration [7:36272]
> 
> 
> To Group:
> 
> I am working with a client who is having problems with Video 
> Conference 
> using Polycom Equipment. The problem is jitter and audio drops. 
> 
> The solution that has been suggested to us by Cisco Low 
> Latency Queueing
> (LLQ)
> over Frame Relay. 
> 
> I'm not sure the release but I was told this is a new feature 
> for Frame
> Relay.
> We were instructed to upgrade to 12.2.6a IP Plus Feature Set...
> 
> We did this..
> 
> This particular client has one DLCI on the physical 
> interface, the port
> speed of the interface
> is 768kb. This is the same for both sites that have the video 
> equipment. 
> 
> Here's the configuration I put together.
> 
> 
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any range 3230 3231
> access-list 101 permit udp any any range 3230 3235
> 
> 
> class-map match-all video
> match access-group 101
> 
> 
> Policy-map video-police
> class video
> priority 540
> class class-default
> fair-queue 64
> 
> 
> map-class frame-relay video-data
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> frame-relay cir 768000
> frame-relay bc 7680
> frame-relay be 0
> service-policy out video-police
> frame-relay fragment 1280
> 
> ****Applied to these two commands to physical interface.
> 
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay class video-data
> 
> Here's the error we are getting.
> 
> I/f Serial0/0 DLCI 400 class video requested bandwidth 540 (kbps)
> Not Available
> Removing service policy from map-class
> 
> We even tried this on a router not connected to the network 
> at all. When you
> do a show 
> run after the error the service-policy statement is removed from the
> map-class configuration.
> 
> Does anyone have experience with LLQ or have any suggestions.
> 
> Stephen Manuel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36280&t=36272
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to