DON"T buy a 4224 !!!!!!!!!!!! Think of the ICS7750 when it first came out........BUGS, No documentation, weird config. limited features activated at this time.
And don't even think of using an an PRI uplink to the telco AND the FXS ports even though they let you configure it this way. The 4224 has a fixed number of DSP's and won't support both. Unless you only want 16 B channels active on your PRI link This "all-in-one" box will someday be a pretty cool box. But it's just too new right now. Wait a awhile and maybe..... I am speaking from experience here ! Tony M. #6172 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Padjen" To: Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:21 PM Subject: Cisco 4224 versus 26/3600 [7:37051] > Does anyone have experience with the 4224 and/or > 2651/3640 platform in a branch setting? I am looking > at both platforms and considering VOIP, but mcast and > QoS are required. I know that LLQ is not available yet > on the 4224. > > Thanks for the input. > > ===== > Robert Padjen > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37056&t=37051 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
