2600 is enough.... actualy Cisco's vg200 is a modified 2600... (that is what
is used as the voip gateway)  That gateway can also function as the call
manager but you lose a lot fo functionallity.... (it is normaly used as a
back up call manager)  Say your call mnager is across a wan link and the wan
link goes down...the 2600/vg200 will act as a temp call manager until the
wan link comes back up, allowing all local calls.  And if you bring a
separate T into the 2600/vg200 then it can also route outbound calls if the
wan link is down.

If you plan on using a full featured call manager server, then you will need
to contact cisco for a demo.....

-Patrick

>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"  03/05/02 01:07PM >>>
Greetings all,

What is the minimum equipment I need to setup/test VoIP?  I've a lot
26XX and 36XX routers around here.  Any suggestions would be great.

Thanks............Nabil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Confidentiality Disclaimer   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed.  This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.

================================================================




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37303&t=37298
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to