Wonder if anyone has ever tried this senario: Router A run both OSPF and IGRP which redistribute into each other. Router R run IGRP with router A. The direct link between A (Ethernet 0)& B (Ethernet 0) is /24 (172.16.100.0/24 -IGRP).
On router A, there are a prefix with /22 mask which run OSPF Area 0 (Ehthenet 1 - 172.16.200.0/22). In order to force 172.16.200.0/22 into IGRP domain, I do the "summary-address 172.16.200.0/24), then router B would be able to see the route (172.16.200.0/24). But on router A, a summary-route also create in the routing table point to null interface (172.16.200.0/24 nexthop NULL 0). In affect, the router will send all traffic to null interface (drop the traffic) for 172.16.200.0 since it has a longer net mask (/24) than the direct link (/22). Any thought or work around for this problem without using static route? Thank you, -Hung __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37739&t=37739 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
