All, Good day. I have some old Motorola routers 6560 and 6520 . Though very rugged , i wish to trade them in for cisco boxes 2600..0r 2500 0r 1750. will appreciate if anyone can give me a lead on who to talk to . I am in Nigeria. Thank you. olubunmi Cisco Certification Digest wrote: Cisco Certification Digest Tuesday, March 19 2002 Volume 02 : Number 1972
In this issue of the Cisco Certification Mailing List Digest: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Re: NAT with printer [7:38781] Re: ATM for CCIE [7:38772] RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] PIX [7:38804] RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Re: Eigrp not responding to bandwidth commands [7:38744] Re: Rack [7:38796] RE: 7204 vxr bootflash [7:38777] Re: Rack [7:38796] RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] AW: NAT with printer [7:38781] Re: Is cable network really a shared medium? [7:38705] tacacs+ ports [7:38814] RE: IPSEC UDP [7:38782] RE: ATM for CCIE [7:38772] Re: tacacs+ ports [7:38814] Home Network [7:38818] RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Re: Is cable network really a shared medium?(more [7:38718] CEF/MLS, IOS SLB & Win2K [7:38821] Flapping [7:38822] Bit Swapping [7:38823] SNMP Packet question [7:38824] RE: Home Network [7:38818] Re: 7204 vxr bootflash [7:38777] Re: Home Network [7:38818] Re: Appreciate Your Expertise On This Strange ARP Problem [7:38828] wan home lab [7:38829] RE: Flapping [7:38822] RE: Flapping [7:38822] RE: Flapping [7:38822] Re: SNMP Packet question [7:38824] Link [7:38718] RE: Rack [7:38796] RE: SNMP Packet question [7:38824] Re: Rack [7:38796] NAT overlapping example....Does not work? [7:38838] RE: How to monitor the bridging traffic at routers [7:38758] Re: Is cable network really a shared medium? [7:38705] RE: Bit Swapping [7:38823] Re: Is cable network really a shared medium?(more [7:38718] Re: wan home lab [7:38829] RE: Flapping [7:38822] Re: Home Network [7:38818] Re: Is cable network really a shared medium?(more [7:38718] RE: Rack [7:38796] Re: How to monitor the bridging traffic at routers [7:38758] Re: How to monitor the bridging traffic at routers [7:38758] isdn inbound [7:38851] RE: wan home lab [7:38829] RE: SNMP Packet question [7:38824] Re: Rack [7:38796] Whats the difference between Classful & Classless??? [7:38856] BGP Question [7:38858] Hybrid to Native IOS conversion [7:38859] RE: Appreciate Your Expertise On This Strange ARP Problem [7:38860] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:42:13 -0500 From: "Bond, Jeffrey T" Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Is it possible for you to update the firmware on your card - -----Original Message----- From: Zolla Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Yes. This is a network printer with a card. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:47:59 -0500 From: "Marc Thach Xuan Ky" Subject: Re: NAT with printer [7:38781] Have you disallowed the printer address with an acl for the pool? Marc Zolla Zimmerman wrote: > > Hi All, > > I really have a problem. I have enabled NAT on the router. I am able to > reach all PCs but the printer. Here is the senario: > > 192.168.1.0 192.168.3.0 > | | > | | > --------------Router1-----------------Router2---------- > | > | > 192.168.3.252 > (Printer) > > 1. We have enabled NAT on router2 to translate 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.250 to a > pool 192.168.8.0 > 2. Enabled static NAT for printer to 192.168.8.252 > > Please help > > Zolla Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:48:07 -0500 From: "Tom Scott" Subject: Re: ATM for CCIE [7:38772] The one book I'm reading is from ciscopress: Cisco ATM Solutions, by Galina Pildush The next question is, How does a cash-challenged individual such as myself set up an ATM lab in his basement? Someone mentioned the LS-100 in a previous message. What are the going prices on that? Also, can I find affordable cards for a low-end router (say, a 2500/2600) to turn it into an ATM switch as we can do for a FR switch. The FR switch command is "frame-relay route"; is there something like "atm route" that enables the switching of ATM circuits from one interface (or subinterface) to another? If so, then we could emulate a service-provider cloud, which we then could access across a standard UNI. The bottom line here is the bottom line: Can it be done affordably in our practice labs? - -- TT - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: ATM for CCIE [7:38772] Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:25:46 -0500 From: "Matthew Meiers" Reply-To: "Matthew Meiers" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone know any good ATM books? - -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Persio Pucci Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATM for CCIE [7:38772] Folks, I'm reading the CCIE Resource Kit 2001 Ed., and I think that the amount of information about ATM that the book covers is just insufficient for the test. Anybody feels like this? Or is it just enough? Any recommendation for ATM? Regards, Persio Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:48:49 -0500 From: "Steve Smith" Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] have you done this for the HP card? ip nat pool pool 64.64.64.64 64.64.64.64 netmask 255.255.255.252 ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.1 9100 64.64.64.64 9150 extendable - -----Original Message----- From: Zolla Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Yes. This is a network printer with a card. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:49:49 -0500 From: "Zolla Zimmerman" Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] No. I can not do this. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:50:37 -0500 From: "sparks eric" Subject: PIX [7:38804] Does anyone know how one goes about tftp'ing a config file to a PIX520 running 6.1.1 code? Is it the same as bringing a new image in? Also, how is the memory structured in a PIX. I just can't find this info in the 6.1 docs. duhhhhhh! Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:52:31 -0500 From: "Zolla Zimmerman" Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] No it is Lexmark printer. I do not know the printer has a card or a print server. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:54:13 -0500 From: "Arjen Dragt" Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] Yes, change the default gateway of the printer to be router2. And before you go too far with this NAT/printer thing, make sure that you can ping the printer from its local network. - -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: March 19, 2002 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT with printer [7:38781] What do you mean by routing engine? I can ping the server from the other network. The server has routing information. Do I have to change the gateway on the printer to point the router? Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:54:24 -0500 From: "MADMAN" Subject: Re: Eigrp not responding to bandwidth commands [7:38744] In the diagram and configs it's not clear where exactly nw 1, 2 and 3 are, you cut that part of the config out. I know changing the bandwidth works well and quite fast. I have done so in the past for a customer running a 6M ATM pipe and T1 frame relay for redundancy. We needed to work on the router that terminated the ATM so I simply changed the bandwidth to 100 and with a couple seconds all the traffic reverted to frame. If you really only want to test whether changing the bandwidth works simply connect two routers back to back with two serial connections, equal clocks, no distribute lists and then change the bandwidth. Dave V patankar wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a very simple three router scenario, using 12.0(10) IOS on 1200 > platform, and configured to run EIGRP. > > > RB > S0/ \ s1 > (nw 1) bw=512 / \ bw=1024 (nw 2) > s1 / \ s1 > RC ------- RA > bw=512 > nw 3 > > All the three links are serial links connected by using a back-to-back X.21 > cables. > > Looking at the above diagram you would expect the following > > RB > > all traffic will be send over interface S1 to reach nw 3, and no load > balancing should take place. > > RC > > Two routes, to reach network nw 2, load balancing should take place, and two > routes should be seen in the routing tabel. > > RA > > All traffic should leave via interface S1 to reach the nw 1 and no load > balancing should take place. > > Problem: > > All the routers are showing that two paths exist to reach the destination > networks. > > Please check the outputs: > ----------------------------------- > ra# > interface Serial0 > bandwidth 512 > ip address 172.16.91.21 255.255.255.252 > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial1 > bandwidth 1024 > ip address 172.16.91.25 255.255.255.252 > ! > router eigrp 1 > passive-interface Ethernet0 > network 172.16.0.0 > distribute-list 1 out Serial0 > distribute-list 1 out Serial1 > auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > D 172.16.91.28/30 [90/6023936] via 172.16.91.26, Serial1 > [90/6023936] via 172.16.91.22, Serial0 > C 172.16.91.24/30 is directly connected, Serial1 > ra# > > ------------------------------------ > interface Serial0 > bandwidth 512 > ip address 172.16.91.30 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > no ip mroute-cache > no fair-queue > clockrate 38400 > ! > interface Serial1 > bandwidth 1024 > ip address 172.16.91.26 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > clockrate 38400 > ! > router eigrp 1 > passive-interface Ethernet0 > network 172.16.0.0 > distribute-list 1 out Serial0 > distribute-list 1 out Serial1 > rb# > > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks > C 172.16.15.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > D 172.16.91.20/30 [90/6023936] via 172.16.91.25, Serial1 > [90/6023936] via 172.16.91.29, Serial0 > C 172.16.91.28/30 is directly connected, Serial0 > C 172.16.91.24/30 is directly connected, Serial1 > ------------------------------------- > rc# > > interface Serial0 > bandwidth 512 > ip address 172.16.91.22 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > no ip mroute-cache > delay 2000 > no fair-queue > clockrate 38400 > ! > interface Serial1 > bandwidth 512 > ip address 172.16.91.29 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > ! > router eigrp 1 > passive-interface Ethernet0 > network 172.16.0.0 > distribute-list 1 out Serial0 > distribute-list 1 out Serial1 > ! > > Gateway of last resort is not set > > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks > C 172.16.14.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > C 172.16.91.20/30 is directly connected, Serial0 > C 172.16.91.28/30 is directly connected, Serial1 > D 172.16.91.24/30 [90/6023936] via 172.16.91.21, Serial0 > [90/6023936] via 172.16.91.30, Serial1 > rc# > ------------------------------------- > P.S. By changing the delay parameter on rb for inteface s0 (20000 -> 20001) > will for the traffic to go via interface s1. > > Has anyone seen this behaviour before, is it normal for Eigrp to behave in > such a way ? > > Note: All the Ethernet networks are 172.16.15.0, 172.16.14.0 and 172.16.90.0 > all using a 24 bit mask, the distribute list was used to stop these updates > from entering the eigrp routing table. > > The main focus here is to find out why the bandwidth command when used in > EIGRP is not effective. I hope I have not confussed anyone. > > Thanks in Advance. > vp - -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:57:12 -0500 From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Subject: Re: Rack [7:38796] Hello all, I am looking for a rack with shelves as well, any advice would be appreciated. Cheap would be good too! :-) Kevin McCarty Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector 618 622 4757 "Woods, Randall, To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOLCM" cc: Sent by: nobody 03/19/2002 09:32 AM Please respond to "Woods, Randall, SOLCM" Hi all, I'm trying to find a rack for my routers. Does anyone have a good source? Woody CCNP Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:07:42 -0500 From: "Maccubbin, Duncan" Subject: RE: 7204 vxr bootflash [7:38777] Another issue is that Cisco has several images out there that are too big for the bootflash: directory. If you want them to fit they need to be about 2.9MB or less. Duncan - -----Original Message----- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 7204 vxr bootflash [7:38777] Not all the images have a parallel boot image. I just try and insure that the boot image is current enough to recognize all the PA's so that if you end up in boot mode you'll have a chance to access the router and download new IOS in necessary. Dave Patrick Donlon wrote: > > Whoops just read my post, I meant to say bootflash not bootrom > > Cheers > > -- > > email me on : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All > > > > just wondered if anyone knows where I can find some information about boot > > rom versions. I'm looking at loading an image of IOS on a new 7204 and > I'd > > like to know what version I should use for the boot rom > > > > cheers > > > > Pat > > > > -- > > > > email me on : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:07:59 -0500 From: "Patrick Ramsey" Subject: Re: Rack [7:38796] I didn't see any with shelves but this is what all my buddies say is good stuff! http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Geyser/9050/ >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 03/19/02 10:57AM >>> Hello all, I am looking for a rack with shelves as well, any advice would be appreciated. Cheap would be good too! :-) Kevin McCarty Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector 618 622 4757 "Woods, Randall, To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SOLCM" cc: Sent by: nobody 03/19/2002 09:32 AM Please respond to "Woods, Randall, SOLCM" === message truncated === --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38910&t=38910 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
