would writing an access list to block 224.0.0.5 and .6 do the trick? -----Original Message----- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Blocking OSPF LSA [7:39191]
You could use 'passive-interface' in the ospf config or you could choose not to include a network statement that includes that interface. If you need to advertise that prefix, a possibility might be to redistribute connected. Of course, it all depends on what you're really trying to accomplish. HTH, John >>> "Larry Whitfill" 3/22/02 11:28:35 AM >>> I know how to reduce the number of LSA's being injected into an area by an ABR by using the stub, no-summary command. However, area 3 LSA's are still sent into the area (default route LSA). I know I cab stop them with "database filter," but does anyone know of another way to block all LSA's? Thanks, Larry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39209&t=39191 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
