Okay, so ICMP doens't specify a TTL on it's own.  Doesn't IP by itself
have a TTL of 255?

Maybe i'm missing something. 

Tim

On 11 Apr 2002 01:26:56 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joseph
Ezerski") wrote:

>Ok, according to Stevens (TCP/IP Illustrated Vol 1), the ICMP Ping Packet
>looks like this:
>
>
>    0                   1                   2                   3
>    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |     Type      |     Code      |          Checksum             |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |      Identifier               |      Sequence Number          |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |                          Optional Data                        |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>The RFC 792, does not specify a time value, other than IP TTL (at that time,
>assumed to be in units of seconds).  I think it really depends on how your
>OS has implemented it.  For example, on my Windows PC, the default timeout
>is 2000ms.  However, there is an option you can set (-w in the windows
>world) to extend that timeout.  Stevens mentions something about newer UNIX
>implementations (as of the early 90s) timing out after 20 seconds.  My
>Solaris box times out after 20 s, and it is listed in the man pages as such.
>
>HTH
>
>-Joe
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Ouellette, Tim
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:13 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: Ping times? Am i missing something
>
>
>The other day while troubleshooting an issue, I saw some pings from out
>Tivoli Netview box and it was showing ping times in the 15,000+ ms range. Is
>this possible? I though there was a limit on this particular field in the
>head. If an of our frame-format experts (Priscilla?)  or sniffer gurus
>(again... Priscilla?), could point me someone I'd appreciate it.  Thanks a
>bunch!
>_________________________________________________________________
>Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
>Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41160&t=41151
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to