sounds like normal behaviour to me. http passes no traffic other than what is actually sent or received - no keepalives of any kind. telnet sessions require keepalives to remain active.
Just my opinion, but I find the Cisco web interface practically useless for anything that involves real work. Chuck ""group study"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > Iam recently looking into the Command Line interface and web interface of a > router.To my surprise, when a Web Interface is invoked, it send some bulk of > traffic on the network and remains constant if we don't do anything at the > front end whereas on the contrary,I can see when a Command Line interface is > invoked,it repeatedly sends some traffic (Telnet) everytime on the network > irrespective of you do anything at the front end. > > So my question, which one is better?So far, I thought Command Line is better > ,But, now I feel Web Interface is much better in terms of traffic. > > Has anybody noticed this. > > Further help is appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Jay > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41665&t=41660 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
