did anything else change? I ask because on the surface, everything is fine.
IPX EIGRP should have no effect on your throughput. I ran an eight site dual
homed IPX network for several years, with no WAN issues other than the usual
telco related problems. I've done numerous labs.

the so called AS numbers in EIGRP are not relevant. IPX and IP are different
router processes, and there is no conflict there.

are you seeing all routes in all router's tables? got a loop in there
somewhere? accidentally shut down some interfaces? got a telco problem that
occurred coincidentally? checked your interface counters, your process
counters? done some debugs while doing the file transfers?

HTH



""Ali, Abbas""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a network where corporate is connected to 3 branch offices through
> Point to Point.  The branch office are also connected together in a full
> mesh frame-relay toplogy as a backup.  The corporate office is also
> connected to few other small branches in a hub and spoke frame-relay
> topology.  I was running IPX RIP by default between those networks and
> response time between IPX hosts and servers was not really bad.  I decided
> to make some more changes to decrease the latency by configuring IPX eigrp
> between WAN Links only and left RIP on LAN interfaces.  Instead of
> decreasing the latency it increased it by 4 times.  Before EIGRP I copied
a
> file and it took about 20 seconds.  Now it's taking almost 4 minutes.  I
am
> curious where I went wrong.
>
> All I did to enable IPX Router eigrp 2
> advertised all my WAN networks.
>
> network xxxx
> network xxxx and so on.
>
> I then removed those WAN networks from RIP routing by
>
> IPX router rip
> no network xxxx
> no network xxxx and so on.
>
> Note:  I am also running EIGRP 1 for IP network.  I don't think that it
will
> conflict since both have under different Autonomous systems.
>
> Any suggestions folks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ab




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42748&t=42735
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to