How can there be a conflict of interests if it's free ? As Howard has said, the materials is free as long as his copyright message remains, and that it is non-commercial useage...
Just a FYI in case some of the people on this list isn't aware of... Marc Russell of CCBootCamp isn't a CCIE either . SO ? It's irrelevant, if you think his materials isn't useful, filter it off.... I personally think that it's quite good although I am not impress with the latest incanations due to the "copy protected" papers used. I think the final decision on who is allowed to "spam" lies with Paul... it's his list and his server , and it's a real OPT-IN unlike some of the spams out there... ""Peter Rosenthal"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thank you very much for the spam. It is appreciated by all I'm sure. > Hopefully people do not contribute to yet another CCIE rack site that uses > GS to spam. I am amazed this is being allowed. But, I guess that's what > happens when you have a "partnership." > > Does anyone else see a conflict of interest here? Other vendors have been > pushed off the list yet Howard is allowed to frequently spam here. Someone > even told me that all cc-bootcmp messages are being filtered because they > want to keep their competition off the list. I don't know if this is true, > so I guess I'll have to try a test message to see if they filter it. > > Besides, who wants to read CCIE prep material from a guy that hasn't even > passed the lab! Howard does us all a favor and please go take the lab. > You're so awesome with all your books and work on the IETF so it should be a > breeze. No excuses! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" > To: ; > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:57 AM > Subject: Some free scenarios and tutorials (slight correction) > > > > I've set up an anonymous FTP server at 12.107.238.3. Sorry for the > > IP address; it will be ftp.gettlabs.com when our DNS administrator > > updates the file. > > > > Anyway, it contains two general sorts of things. First, there's a > > collection of tutorials I've written, plus some of my ongoing work in > > the IETF and IRTF. > > > > Second, there are an assortment of scenarios in beta test. Discussion > > on this list is encouraged, and I'll be happy to discuss some of the > > assumptions in their design. Please discuss this on the open list. > > > > Legal disclaimer on scenarios: > > Copyright 2002, Gettlabs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > License is granted only for individual, noncommercial use. > > Scenarios may not be further distributed by the person downloading. > > > > In other words, enjoy them as long as you use them in your own > > studies and for nothing else. I ask that you not distribute them > > simply for quality control -- things are constantly being updated and > > I'd like to be sure people download the most recent version. > > > > Commercial disclaimer: these all run on the www.gettlabs.com racks, > > and we'd be delighted if you bought rack time to run them. That's not > > a requirement. Gettlabs proper operates on a modified open source > > arrangement for its scenarios. I have cleared this with Paul > > Borghese, and our agreement is that as long as there are no charges > > for the scenarios themselves, even they run on a commercial rack, > > they will not be considered commercial for open discussion. > > > > Some of our partners, such as IPexpert and Groupstudy, > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > I meant CertificationZone. Brain not fully interoperable > with > > fingers this morning. > > > > > > sell scenarios that run on our racks. If you want to buy them, go to > > their sites and pay them what they ask. What we sell is rack time > > and, in a broader context, consultant and reseller services. > > > > Technical disclaimers: No warranty is implied; many of these > > secenarios are still in test and are being put out to the community > > both for general learning and further evaluation. Even after they > > are fully operational, they still will be downloadable with no charge. > > > > Couple of miscellaneous notes: > > > > Scenarios 1 through 4 are meant to be run one after another, with 5 > and 6 > > coming. You can run 2, 3, or 4 by itself, as long as you preload the > > configurations that come before it. > > The "H" files contain initialization configurations. In general, > > addresses are preassigned for non-frame/ATM/ISDN interfaces, and you > > are given an address range for switched interfaes. > > -- > > "What Problem are you trying to solve?" > > ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not > > directly to me*** > > > **************************************************************************** > **** > > Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications > http://www.gettlabs.com > > Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com > > "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html > > Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html > > Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42997&t=42997 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
