Well, depends what you have in mind by route injection. There's a 
difference between a full routing implementation, and something like 
BGPsim, which can play back (or generate) updates.  Now, I can't 
speak to a specific product, but many of the standalone protocol 
analyzers I've worked with let you send prerecorded traffic.

That's probably your only alternative for (E)IGRP.


At 8:20 AM -0400 5/3/02, John Dorffler wrote:
>Howard, thanks for the reply. I've already been playing with Zebra a little
>bit and I like it so far. I was hoping to find any Windows-based routing
>services to have "one more tool in the toolbox". A Unix/Linux server is not
>always around when you need one...
>
>John Dorffler
>CCIE #6677
>
>""Howard C. Berkowitz""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  At 11:28 AM -0400 5/2/02, John Dorffler wrote:
>>  >Does anybody know whether there is software available somewhere that
lets
>>  >you run IP routing protocols on a Windows computer? I know that Windows
>2000
>>  >supports RIP and OSPF, while UNIX/Linux supports BGP. Is there something
>>  >that lets you run IGRP, EIGRP, or BGP on Windows? I think that would be
>>  >useful if you needed to inject routes into a lab environment when a
spare
>>  >router is not available.
>>  >
>>  >Thank you,
>>  >John Dorffler
>>  >CCIE #6677
>>
>>  Let me answer a little indirectly.  I forget the name of it, but
>>  Microsoft does have a licensed port of Bay RS, which at least runs
>>  RIP and OSPF.  The Bay software does support BGP, but I don't know if
>>  Microsoft's implementation does.
>>
>>  If you're willing to use the PC with *NIX, you have some major
>>  alternatives. There is the Multithreaded Routing Toolkit (MRT) and
>>  old versions of GateD at www.merit.edu. There is GNU Zebra at
>>  www.zebra.org.   Last time I looked, these both supported RIP, OSPF,
>>  ISIS, and BGP. Might be some multicast.
>>
>>  There are commercial-grade versions of both:  see www.nexthop.com and
>>  www.ipinfusion.com.  These are apt to have more recent stuff such as
>>  traffic engineering extensions, MPLS, etc.
>>
>>  Most of the early development was on NetBSD, but you're pretty safe
>>  assuming they will run on Linux or FreeBSD.
>>
>>  Of the two, I most recently used Zebra, which has a command language
>>  more Cisco-like than GateD, which is Juniper-like (there's a fair bit
>>  of GateD tradition in JunOS heritage). At the time, Zebra's BGP was
>>  probably a little stranger than GateD, but both have pros and cons.
>>
>>  Merit also has something called BGPsim, which specifically generates
>>  BGP updates but is not a BGP routing process -- it lets you do
>>  things, however, such as generating bad routes or arbitrary AS paths.
>>
>>  I should be working with Zebra and BGPsim in the next couple of weeks
>>  to set up an Internet simulator, along with routers.  I'll have more
>>  recent data then.
>>
>>  --
>>  "What Problem are you trying to solve?"
>>  ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not
>>  directly to me***
>>
>****************************************************************************
>****
>>  Howard C. Berkowitz      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications
>http://www.gettlabs.com
>>  Technical Director, CertificationZone.com
http://www.certificationzone.com
>>  "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43230&t=43124
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to