""Chris Headings""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We are an ISP in So. Cal.  We are gearing up to open other offices in
> bewteen Arizona and Ca...
>
> We are trying to decide what would be the best way of intergrating our ISP
> network...like...
>
> Should we just continue to use our one ASN and have all traffic come back
to
> the Global NOC, or should get new ASN's for each location???

Philip Smith's Multihoming NANOG presentation covers disconnected backbones
and ASN usage.

> Should we be using IS-IS, IBGP/EBGP, OSPF as the protocol to link all
remote
> locations???

Yes.  If you can afford it (and I can't see why you wouldn't be able to),
you should
have all routers take part in IBGP.  Doesn't matter about the IGP, some
people
prefer IS-IS, and others prefer OSPF.  GlobalCrossing and AboveNet (and
probably
other ISP's) had to move to IS-IS eventually, and migration is terrible.  If
you have
the knowledge or time to invest in IS-IS, I would suggest looking into that
as an option
before your network grows too large.  Fortunately, there are a lot of really
good
resources out there today (for both IS-IS and OSPF, actually ;> ).

> Obviously cost in an issue, but throwing cost out the door, what is the
> ideal way of linking ALL offices, using a good level of redundancy and
great
> preformance...

Metro Ethernet and wavelength services make purchasing distance bandwidth a
lot
easier.  Co-location has also come a long way, making transit and peering
very easy
and cost effective.  You are no longer being forced to connect into some
strange,
unknown remote POP via costly (and difficult to provision) SONET circuits
and router
interfaces.  Look into your Exchange Points and Metro Providers (CLEC's for
fiber and
optical wavelengths) possibilities.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43899&t=43836
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to