Mike Wrote: > 192.168.1.1 Netid > 192.168.1.2 host1 > 192.168.1.3 host2 > 192.168.1.4 Broadcast > 192.168.1.5 Netid > 192.168.1.6 host1 > 192.168.1.7 host2 > 192.168.1.8 Broadcast
This is not correct with a /30 subnet mask. This is the correct numbering. 192.168.1.0 Netid 192.168.1.1 host 1 192.168.1.2 host 2 192.168.1.3 Broadcast 192.168.1.4 Netid 192.168.1.5 host 1 192.168.1.6 host 2 192.168.1.7 Broadcast 192.168.1.8 Netid If the outside address was .5 and the route outside statement was everything to .6 this would be correct syntax... HTH, Stephen Manuel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44850&t=44749 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
