I tried to install the practice test, but no dice so far. I don't suppose it's win2k friendly?
In the meantime, would you mind sharing with us the wording of the question? I think it's fair to require someone to know the significance of the optional mac address after the IPX routing command, but depending on how you worded the question (and how the explanation of the correct answer is worded) you may be getting ready to frustrate the h3ll out of anyone who takes it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCNA level IPX question, proper phrasing [7:45138] > > > So far I'm running about 3 to 1 in favor of the question as > it is. Both > sides have made interesting arguments in their favor. But I'm > a bit biased :) > > Logan, I had not thought of the IPX pinging, good call on that. > > MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45269&t=45138 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
