You got it right.  But, you can do trunking over FXO as well.  The E&M and
FXO cards are both analog, just different signaling.  E&M is preferred.  And
you could also use a CAS/CCS T1 card between router and PBX if more than 4
calls may be needed at one time.

And as I'm a salesman, I'd say get rid of the PBX altogether and go CM/IPtel
all the way!


""Michael Williams""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Okay..... voice gurus..... please correct me if I'm wrong, but I want to
> take a stab as this just to make sure my info is right... (because we're
> looking at a similar situation)
>
> You need the NM-2V  (or NM-1V) which would plug into the module slot on
the
> 2600/3600.  That module then has 1 or 2 (for the 1V or 2V respectively)
VIC
> slots.  So you would insert the VIC-2FXO into a slot on the NM.
>
> As far as the module goes, are you going to handle individual calls or
> trunks directly from the PBX?  If you want to do trunking (to handle many
> calls) use the VIC-2E/M.
>
> Here's a great URL that actually shows the NM-1V and NM-2V so you can see
> the slots on them, as well as showing the VICs.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/vone__p1.htm
>
> As far as the WIC-T2, that will work if you have external CSU/DSUs and if
> you need 2 T1 lines.  If you only need one T1, you can use the
WIC-1DSU-T1.
> I like them because they have the built-in CSU/DSU (one less thing to
worry
> about) and takes the RJ-45 T1 directly.  Here is more info on this WIC:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/t1duwny1.htm
>
> Here are examples of configurations of this WIC.... (this URL *will* wrap,
> so watch out)
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113t/113t_
3/36t1csu.htm
>
> Hope this helps!
> Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45396&t=45358
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to