There should be nothing particularly shocking about being able to take full BGP routes with a "small" router like a 2650. BGP doesn't use up as much resources as a lot of people seem to think.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/41.shtml ""Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is a 2650 getting full routes from AT&T and UUNet with a T1 to each > provider. > > > Total: 101929412, Used: 67234276, Free: 34695136 > PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process > 0 0 75536 1808 4650980 0 0 *Init* > 0 0 752 970112 752 0 0 *Sched* > 0 0 17642116 10399220 187676 163440 0 *Dead* > 1 0 280 280 3864 0 0 Load Meter > > 2 0 9028 212388 9920 780 0 OSPF Hello > > 3 0 0 664 6864 0 0 Check > heaps > 4 0 20248 0 27112 0 0 Chunk > Manager > 5 0 20008464 24080 199956 6131440 10880 Pool > Manager > 6 0 280 280 6864 0 0 Timers > 7 0 280 280 6864 0 0 Serial > Backgroun > 8 0 0 0 6864 0 0 > ALARM_TRIGGER_SC > 9 0 280 280 6864 0 0 > Environmental mo > 10 0 6596964 31309820 36792 1641380 0 ARP Input Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46097&t=46066 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
