I setup access-lists as such: access-list 101 permit ip any 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 access-list 102 permit ip any 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0
then I made the priority-list: priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 101 priority-list 1 protocol ip low list 102 My question is, would this make any packet that comes into the interface (whatever interface i implemented the priority-list on) have higher priority going to host 192.168.1.1 over 192.168.1.2? Basically I'm wondering if that setup above would work. I did not actually set that scenario up but I wanted to know for my own personal knowledge if the extended access list would work like that with priority queuing :-) Thanks for the help! Jarred Nicholls, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46108&t=46108 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
