> Hello Gang, > > I am trying to figure out a way to control routes > advertised by various routing protocols out > particular > interfaces. For example, I have four routers: R1, > R2, > R3, and R4. R1 is configured to use IGRP, OSPF, and > EIGRP. It connects to R2, R3, and R4. R1-R2 link > is > running IGRP, R1-R3 link is running EIGRP, and R1-R4 > link is running OSPF. I am using a class B subnet > of > 138.10.50.0/24 on R1-R2 link, 138.10.26.0/24 on > R1-R3 > link, and 138.10.36.0/24 on R1-R4 link. I only want > 138.10.50.0/24 route learned by R2 via IGRP > natively, > I do not want R2 to learn 138.10.36.0/24 and > 138.10.26.0/24 routes as part of IGRP networks. > These > two networks belong to OSPF and EIGRP respectively. > If I filter out 138.10.26.0/24 and 138.10.36.0/24, > R2 > will not learn them when I redistribute OSPF and > EIGRP > into IGRP. I considered using route-maps, > distribute-lists, and access-lists. > Passive-interface > does not apply here. I do not know what my other > options are. Any help is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > JD > > ===== > Jignesh Desai > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com >
===== Jignesh Desai __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46283&t=46283 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
