Would RFC1990, section 3 be what you are after?
I tend to find that for low level packet format questions, checking the
RFC is almost always quicker and more successful than searching in books,
most of which don't go down to that level.
JMcL
----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 14/06/2002 03:05 pm -----
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <Theodore.Stout
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14/06/2002 01:29 pm
Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: MultiLink PPP [7:46534]
Is this part of a business decision process?:
Well....aren't you kind of close of violating the NDA.....
Personally speaking....I still don't know this answer. I looked for about
30 minutes in several books and then just didn't care any more.
Theo
"Kris Keen"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/14/2002 11:46 AM
Please respond to "Kris Keen"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: MultiLink PPP [7:46534]
Hi All
I know that mppp allows the the reassembly of the packets with seq, can
someone tell me how many bytes in the frame are used for seq/assembly?
believe it or not, its in the CID exam
Cheers
Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may
contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject
to legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited by several
Commonwealth Acts of Parliament. If you have received this communication in
error please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
transmission together with any attachments.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46550&t=46534
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
