Brian, If you have full meshed IBGP sessions then r1 will automatically get the route to 12.X.X.X in case link to UUNET failed. Or you have to use r1 and r2 as the route reflectors. Hope this helps, J. brian kastor wrote: All,
I have 2 sites. We currently get full routing tables from uunet and AT&T into a single router. We want to put a second router at another site and run IBGP between just those two. We will have two routers between the two running BGP. I guess it would look something like this: site1-r1(bgp)---r2---r3---r4(bgp)-site2 R1 will get UUnet, r4 will get at&t. R1(UUNet) is being used as primary. Behind R1 is our HQ. Behind r4 is a large branch. My concern would be if the link to UUnet goes down, how does traffic from site 1 get out r4. Scenario: User pings 12.x.x.x This is unknown on site 1, so it goes to r1. UUnet is down, so the route is pointing to r4 (ibgp). The packet still has a destination address of 12.x.x.x, but how does r2 know what to do with this packet? It doesn't know where 12.x.x.x is? Someone here at work brought this up to me and I keep saying that the ibgp session gets established, so when you look at the table on r1 for 12.x.x.x, the next hop is the interface of r4. He keeps saying, 'yeah, but when that packet gets to r2, the destination is 12.x.x.x, which it doesn't know.' All of this can be solved if someone tells me that we just need to run ibgp on all 4 routers and i shouldn't see a performance hit. I am worried because these routers are going to be routing user traffic between the sites. Thanks, bk Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46643&t=46565 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
