Since I noticed a plug for another company I'll throw in my 2 cents. I'm not sure what services you are looking for but we offer quite a few and have a good global presence. While most company's are in piles of debt, we have a surplus of cash. Even after making acquisitions such as Exodus, we still sit on top.
For your own comparison purposes: Here is a link to our Network maps showing our global infrastructure. http://www1.cw.com/template_05.jsp?ID=gn_network# Here is a link to our Internet backbone performance standards: http://www.sla.cw.net/ Thanks! Mike Munoz Network Engineer US Data GSOC Tier II Cable & Wireless -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Columbus Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655] I know this probably isn't the best forum, but I thought I'd post it here since I'm sure some of you guys have insight and opinions... I've seen so many problems in the carrier market in the last few years that I'm no longer sure who to trust when they tell me that they're financially stable. Global Crossing is very weak. We all know about WorldCom/UUNET. Qwest is struggling. Who, in your experience, is still a stable, major player in the US carrier / dedicated transmission market? Genuity? AT&T? Cable and Wireless? Time Warner Telecom? Who would be your first choice for carrier in today's economy? Craig Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47855&t=47655 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
