without having had the chance to verify this for myself, I can offer that someone who occasionally lurks on this list once told me about a good RIP lab he designed, in which this issue is covered. His purpose in designing this particular lab was to demonstrate exactly what you are reporting, and to show how you can get screwed as a result.
I've been meaning to look at this for some time now. Don't know if I'll have a chance in the near future, but if I do, I will certainly report the result. Chuck ""Leo Song"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, there. > > In case a RIP v1 speaking router (Send v1 and Receive v1 & v2)receives > RIP v2 updates, how does it process those unused fields within v1, say > subnet mask. According to Jeff Volume I, it would ignore them but my RIP > v1 router does show up the network address as well as subnet mask, > please advise. > > Best Regards. > Leo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48075&t=48072 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
