Priscilla's answer is very true, but I have seen interfaces reporting
one-way traffic greater than they should be able to transmit - for
example, an ISDN B-channel reporting an output rate of 66 kbps. Not a
pretty sight.
While I didn't check it in detail, my assumption was that it was reporting
the load the router was attempting to shove over the link - I don't think
all that traffic was making it to the other end :-(
JMcL
----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 10/07/2002 08:38 am -----
"Priscilla Oppenheimer"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/07/2002 02:31 am
Please respond to "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: interface traffic showing unreasonable
statistics [7:48397]
uday wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I am using a cisco router with a frac-E1 link terminated on it
> (256kbps). I am
> running some Ipsec tunnels
> across this link. Sometimes i have found that i/p o/p rate
> shows more then
> 256kbps using the show interface ser command.
Do you mean that the combined input/output rate exceeds 256 kbps? That
could
be normal. It's full duplex. The capacity is available in both directions
on
point-to-point WAN circuits.
Priscilla
>
> i have seen it upto 320000 bps?
>
> Plz can somebody explain this?
> thanks /regards,
>
> Uday
Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may
contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject
to legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited by several
Commonwealth Acts of Parliament. If you have received this communication in
error please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
transmission together with any attachments.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48445&t=48397
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
