Michael Williams wrote: > I can't see there would be an RFC on how many letters can be used, > especially since acronyms have been used far longer than the acronym > has been around........
This may be true. However, one should exercise care in regard to MTU in avian systems. The RFC specifically indicates 256 milligrams. With genetic engineering, that can be expected to increase. Until further research on carrier strength is conducted, the prudent decision is to stay with the shorter acronyms. To be sure, RFC 1149 compliant transport is robust in certain historical contexts. However, weight limitations are not to be taken lightly. -- HTH, TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48600&t=48586 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
