But doesn't 10.10.10.48 sneek through? > -----Original Message----- > From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ACL studying [7:49154] > > > I reckon you typo'd with the third line Philip. > > How's this: > > access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 > access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 > access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.15 > access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 > access-list 1 permit any > > > ""Blair, Philip S"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > A different spin. > > > > access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.1 > > access-list 1 permit host 10.10.10.34 > > access-list 1 deny 10.10.10.32 0.0.0.127 > > access-list 1 deny host 10.10.10.49 > > access-list 1 permit any > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Persio Pucci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ACL studying [7:49154] > > > > > > Folks, > > > > what would be the smallest way to put an ACL to filter, > let's say, IPs > > 10.10.10.35 to 10.10.10.49? > > > > (just want to check if I am doing it ok...) > > > > Persio
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49185&t=49154 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]