> >Hi, > >You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. >Because >the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be >required >to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a >spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending >Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > >PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL >YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. > > >By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > >1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > >2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > >3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > >4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > >5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > >6. The message is NOT a test message. > >To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once >confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > >Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > >------ORIGINAL MESSAGE--------- > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 8 20:44:00 2002 >Received: from hotmail.com (f133.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.133]) > by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00403 > GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:43:59 GMT >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; > Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:43:29 -0700 >Received: from 212.175.24.135 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:43:28 GMT >X-Originating-IP: [212.175.24.135] >From: "Fuat Akar" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:43:28 +0300 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >Message-ID: >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2002 20:43:29.0096 (UTC) >FILETIME=[1D8A1480:01C226C0] > >Hello Everybody, >I need your experiences and help; >I'm a network responsible for a large bussiness sized Service Provider and >at our POPs we would like to give a wireless Internet service to our >customers, but here I have got bandwidth limitation problem at wireless >applications. As you know Wireless Bridges have various connection speeds >from 1Mbps up to 10 Mbps but at that time I would like to give our customer >at speeds of 128k, 256k or 512kbps Internet bandwidth, what will be the >right solution for these type of applications which need a bandwidth >limitation? Maybe Inserting a Layer 3 Switch( or Layer4/7 switches) and >defining the bandwidth limitation in the switch. > >I'll be pleased to get your comments and suggestions. > >Thanks >Fuat AKAR > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: >http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx >
_________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49401&t=49401 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
