This is not entirely true. I've had 34x bridges talking to 352 bridges in stable configurations for long periods of time.
Note that I wouldn't recommend this in the real world ... I got it done by accident one day, not knowing any better. Daniel Cotts wrote: > > FYI I'm resending info provided by a Cisco Channel Partner SE. > > "Cisco Aironet 340 and 350 Series Bridges can be connected to the same LAN > segments, but they cannot communicate > wirelessly. Although you can disable STP on non-root 350 series bridges, 350 > and 340 series bridges are not designed to > interoperate. If you use both 340 and 350 series bridges on your network, > make sure the 340 series bridges have radio bridge > links only to other 340 series bridges, and that 350 series bridges have > radio bridge links only to other 350 series bridges." > > Watch the wrap: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/accsspts/a > p350rn/rn1121.htm#xtocid14 -- Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd "This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money, don't bother my employer about the things I say, just come see me personally and we'll discuss the situation. No names, you twerps should know who you are". Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50056&t=50056 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
