Tunji,

The network commands that you removed were simply useless, it is normal that
they did not have any impact on your routing table. Question:   Is that
normal that the ip address range of the async group is the same as your
loopback. Both are in the 192.168.200.0/24 range. Why don't you just try to
use another address in a different subnet for your loopback, advertise in
your eigrp process and see what happens. Just curious.


Regards,
DT


""Tunji Suleiman""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I am reposting this because there were no responses to the first post. I
am
> trying to conserve IP addresses by using private IPs for dialin users.
From
> clients I can dial in to network but cant get beyond 3640 NAS, cant even
> ping 3640 E0/0 LAN IP address. From 3640, I can ping  Lo0 from E0/0 and
vice
> versa; I can ping connected client on any Async sourcing Lo0, but not
E0/0;
> and I can ping Internet hosts eg www.yahoo.com sourcing e0/0 but not
> loopback0. From 2611 Internet gateway, I can ping 3640 E0/0 and Lo0, but
not
> a connected dialin user on any Async with private IP address assigned by
> 3640 from IP pool. I have a routing issue that makes traffic in both
> directions get to and disappear at 3640 Lo0, but strangely all necessary
> routes (that I can think of) are installed in the route tables. Can
somebody
> pls point out what I'm missing? Below are my configs and route tables:
>
> 3640-NAS Config:
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.200.254 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 216.199.175.12 255.255.255.224
> !
> interface Group-Async1
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> peer default ip address pool PRIVATE
> !
> router eigrp 10
> network 192.168.1.0
> network 192.168.200.0
> network 216.199.175.0
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip local pool PRIVATE 192.168.200.41 192.168.200.88
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 216.199.175.1
>
> 3640-NAS Route Table:
> Gateway of last resort is 216.199.175.1 to network 0.0.0.0
>
>       216.199.175.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C       216.199.175.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
>       192.168.200.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
> C       192.168.200.52/32 is directly connected, Async101
> C       192.168.200.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
>       192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D       192.168.1.0 [90/2195456] via 216.199.175.1, 00:58:16, E0/0
> S*   0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 216.199.175.1
>
>
> 2611-Gateway Config:
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 216.199.175.1 255.255.255.224
> !
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
> !
> router eigrp 10
> network 192.168.1.0
> network 192.168.200.0
> network 216.199.175.0
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
>
> 2611-Gateway Route Table:
> Gateway of last resort is 192.168.1.1 to network 0.0.0.0
>
>       216.199.175.0/27 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C       216.199.175.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
>       192.168.200.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D       192.168.200.0 [90/409600] via 216.199.175.12, 07:51:45, Et0/0
>       192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C       192.168.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> S*   0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
>
> TIA
>
> Tunji
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50603&t=50581
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to