If these are the configs you are running two different versions of RIP. Router 2501A is running version 2 while the others are version 1.
Did you mean to do this? What is the reason you need to redistribute the connected interfaces on the bottom 2 routers? Rip will do this for you. Let the routing protocol do its job. I would remove the redistribute connected on the bottom two routers and load version 2 under rip. This should correct your issues. Rip 2 is classless protocol and supports VLSM as apposed to Rip version 1 which is classful and doesn't support VLSM. (Variable Length Subnet Mask) Ronnie ""Jack Lane"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks for the quick response. Here is the current setup: > > Router2501A: > Router rip > version 2 > network 172.16.0.0 > network 192.168.1.0 > no auto-summary > > Router2502A: > router rip > redistribute connected > network 172.16.0.0 > > Router2524A: > router rip > redistribute connected > network 172.16.0.0 > network 192.168.2.0 > > Any further ideas? > > Thanks, > > Jack Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51499&t=51483 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
