But... (you knew I was going to say that, didn't you...) What if you have 2 Cat5K with dual RSM (each) with on RSM routing for a VLAN spanning both switches? RSM 1 on Cat5K 1 routing for VLAN 25 on Cat5K 1 and 2.
>>> "r34rv13wm1rr0r" 08/21/02 11:21AM >>> If I am not mistaken, and forgive me if I am since it has been a while since I worked with a 5k/RSM setup. I believe that you only need to incorporate the MLS IP RP stuff if you are in the "Router on a Stick" configuration meaning if you have a some 72xx or 75xx's out there doing your VLAN routing. Being that your RSM is incorporated into the switch you should do some sh mls xxx on your switch to see that MLS should be running by default, and there is no need to apply that configuration. I know for a fact this is true on the 65xx platform, but I am sure it also applies to 55xx/RSM also. 16 RP addresses would be external routers ONLY. Good Luck, Anthony ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Diliberto" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: MLS between 2 Cat5K with RSM [7:51841] > I finished reading a CCO document on configuring MLS on the Cat5K this > morning and one big question (well, at least one) remains: > > If I'm using 2 Cat5K switches with dual RSMs each connected with a > trunk, do I have to identify each RSM as an MLS IP RP to each switch to > MLS between switches? Do I need to identify each VLAN routing interface > as an MLS IP RP? The documentation states you can specify up to 16 RP > addresses but we've got more. > > Thanks. > > Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51861&t=51841 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
