so if a CCIE loses his/her active status, does that give him/her the right to continue to post their CCIE # in their sig and tell everyone they are a CCIE? I believe if they lose active status, they are NOT a CCIE anymore (sort of like a doctor losing their credentials). what do you guys think?
thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Voice: 702-968-5100 FAX: 702-968-5104 ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > according to the Cisco Verification tool: > > CCIE Verification Tool > Yes, Stuart Biggs is CCIE number 1025. However, certification is NOT > currently active. (Current status is Inactive). > > Chuck > > > > z > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the > first > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > > below he does provide a name. > > snip > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the > test > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab > itself > > had > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of > an > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > unsnip > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > > us took the > > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > confusion as > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > some have retired, > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > 8031 active > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > tested by CCIE > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52166&t=52166 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
