Though I'm not sure how the nonsensical static route would alleviate the need for a secondary the secondary interface shouldn't be much of an issue. Of coarse I'm assuming your not adding a secondary network with 500 hosts.
"ip route-cache same-interface" is useful if routing between the primary and secondary interface/s. Dave McHugh Randy wrote: > > All, > Does anyone know if using a seconday interface on fast ethernet 0/0 on a > 7204 will degrade perfomance on the network for the primary interface? I > have to route a a different subnet on a LAN and cannot do it without > creating a secondary interace? > > for instance > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 205.109.29.x 255.255.255.128 > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > full-duplex > no cdp enable > interface FastEthernet0/0.1 > ip add 205.109.29.33 255.255.255.224 > > to add a second subnet to this router for that LAN > > Will this degrade performance or cause a problem. > > There is probably a beter way to do it but I the router will not let me > create a static route for this subnet becuase the gateway is the router > itself. > for instance > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > AAAV7204(config)#ip route 205.109.29.32 255.255.255.224 205.109.29.129 > %Invalid next hop address (it's this router) > AAAV7204(config)# > > Thanks, > Randy -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52311&t=52295 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
