Can anyone point me towards a resource that describes in detail what it
takes for BGP to consider a route synchronized when it learned it through
IGP OSPF?  My study partner and I are struggling understanding how it works.
All of our resources provide only general information with statements like,
"a route must be learned by IGP before BGP will consider it synchronized".
Merely learning a route from IGP is apparently not good enough.  There must
be other, more specific requirements.  How does route-reflection affect
BGP/OSPF synchronization?

Specifically, we are working on a lab with three routers running BGP.  They
are in the same AS (IBGP).  They are not fully meshed one is acting as a
router reflector for the other two.  One of the RR clients has a loopback
injected into BGP by redistribute connected.  All three routers are also
running OSPF and have an IGP route to the same network being injected into
BGP.  The route is synchronized on the router it is injected into and on the
route reflector, but it isn't synchronized on the other route reflector
client.  We are aware of how BGP and OSPF router IDs can prevent
synchronization, so we have specified the same router IDs for BGP and OSPF.

What is interesting is that if we point a static route from the problem
route-reflector client to the BGP route "next hop", BGP synchs.  Due to the
network topology and modifications of the ad distance, the problem router
also has a route learned from EIGRP but is not normally in the IP routing
table.  When we shut down an interface so that the EIGRP route is placed in
the IP routing table, BGP synchs.

We are very confused.  There is something about how BGP synchs with OSPF
that we just don't understand.  Any insight from the group will be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks,


Karl Brusen




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52980&t=52980
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to