I've been trying to optimize communications between two distant routers. So
far I've managed to lock myself out of the far router three times, folks
over there are getting weary of my mistakes ;-)

I have a subnet of 172.29.30.0/24 and a subnet of 172.29.10.0/24, the latter
is physically the same devices multihomed as 192.168.100.0/24.

I realize my NAT is messed up and I'm wrapping my head around the literature
pulled from Cisco (led to by links provided by you generous folks).
Looks like I also need to look in depth at access lists. I'm taking baby
steps but am slowly making progress.

Would love to solicit comments/advice on the following:

ip nat pool SCISANRTR001-natpool-1 64.172.228.155 64.172.228.158 netmask
255.255.255.224
ip nat inside source list 101 pool SCISANRTR001-natpool-1 overload
ip nat inside source static 172.29.10.20 64.172.228.154
ip nat inside source static 192.168.100.20 64.172.228.132
ip nat inside source static 192.168.100.135 64.172.228.135
ip nat inside source static 172.29.20.20 64.172.228.133
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0.1
ip route 172.29.20.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1.474
ip route 172.29.40.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1.474
!
logging history size 250
logging history errors
logging facility syslog
access-list 100 permit ip 64.172.228.128 0.0.0.31 172.29.30.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 172.29.30.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 172.29.30.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 172.29.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map nonat permit 10


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54268&t=54268
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to