-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please confirm (conf#99c2dc97cc6fe1343691b05392e865ac)
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you
will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail
address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify
that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS
EMAIL YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE
POSTED.
By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
6. The message is NOT a test message.
To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary.
Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional
confirmations.
Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
------ORIGINAL MESSAGE---------
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 11 03:42:39 2002
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2])
by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA32229;
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 03:42:39 GMT
Received: from mickey (pcp01503282pcs.coatsv01.pa.comcast.net
[68.82.170.6]) by mtaout03.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1
HotFix 1.4 (built Aug 5 2002)) with ESMTP id
; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:42:08 -0400
(EDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:42:04 -0400
From: Joe
Subject: RE: Cisco ExecNet
In-reply-to:
To: "'Albert Lu'" , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id:
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Technology isn't necessarily heading in that direction - Cisco is
driving it there. Bottom line is this: Cisco is traditionally a router
and switch manufacturer, and no one buys routers and switches these
days, at least not enough to provide continued growth for Cisco. Company
infrastructures are already built, have been for years, and are running
for the most part nowhere near capacity. These technology applications,
besides generating hardware sales directly, will also increase bandwidth
consumption, thereby causing indirect hardware sales when customers
upgrade their routers and switches to support the new bandwidth-hungry
apps like VoIP. If Cisco can drive the customers' purchases in that
direction, they win.
My two cents.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Albert Lu
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Cisco ExecNet
Hello Group,
Has anyone checked out the Cisco ExecNet, which is basically thoughts
about where technology is heading in the future from the VPs at Cisco.
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/tln/execnet/
>From what they are saying (specifically Mike Volpi), the direction for
technology is heading towards: CDN, Security, Wireless, IP Telephony,
VPN. Reegineering business processes to best utilise these technologies
in order to improve productivity and reduce cost for enterprises.
Does anyone have any comments about this, and where money will be spent
in the future for technologies?
Regards,
Albert Lu
CCIE #8705
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55570&t=55570
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
