""JM"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have Internet connection to IPS and I don't know what QoS politic to > choose. > I have now 4 classes and CBWFQ: > gold ( SMTP , POP 3) etc. > silver HTTP > bronse ( FTP) > default ( fail-queue) > and service-policy out. > Is there any sense to use CBWFQ on a serial interface like service-policy in > ? > My ISP can't mark or shape my traffic. > What is it the best QoS solusion for input traffic ? > Thanks a lot. > JM
Others might disagree but I see no advantage whatsoever to using QoS mechanisms on the link going to your ISP. Once you hand off traffic to them you're completely at their disposal. You have no control over traffic within their network so why even bother adding queueing to your outgoing interface? If your link is congested often enough that you feel it's necessary I'd suggest getting another circuit installed, if that's possible. Incoming I'd think that CAR would be useful depending on what you're really trying to accomplish. It would at least allow you to classify traffic based on your own criteria and then mark it for special handling within your network. All of this really depends on your specific situation and your goals. John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55567&t=55546 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
