No that is not what I'm saying. When you define a static you are defining a permenant translation for the express purpose of letting connections thru initiated from the outside. You don't want to include the permenant translation in your dynamic pool.
If your doing PAT anyway why have a pool, save your addresses for something else like more statics!!! Dave Karl West wrote: > > Ok...so you are saying the PAT will be considered first? ...hmm and I > would have to break up my pool. > > > MADMAN wrote: > > > DON'T inlcude your statics in the pool!!! > > > > Dave > > > > Karl West wrote: > > > > > > Can someone clear this up for me, I am running PAT on my router > > along with > > > Static NAT. I > > > have notice that > > > the host I am statically NATting is getting picked up by the PAT > > before the > > > Static NAT. > > > I am statically Natting a host that is part of the ACL pool for > > PAT. > > > I thought that the Static Nat would take precedence ? > > > > > > Karl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > David Madland > > CCIE# 2016 > > Sr. Network Engineer > > Qwest Communications > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." > > --Winston > > Churchill -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56306&t=56295 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]