> Just about the last phrase 'The "priority" > command is not used with CBWFQ', > considering that I call LLQ within CBWFQ, is > it correct ?
Well...you calling it "LLQ within CBWFQ" isn't Cisco canon, but your config below is a fine LLQ configuration. I've noticed (especially in my studies of QoS) that the only differentiator between acronym-based technologies (like LLQ and CBWFQ) is just the addition of one little command in an otherwise "old" config. BJ > > policy-map MyPolicy > class Voice > priority 200 > class Silver > bandwidth 200 > class class-default > random-detect > fair-queue Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56605&t=56519 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
