Are both Apple Talk and Decnet not in the current CCIE written Exam?

--
Regards,

Peter Kingston
CCNP

""B.J. Wilson""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You're right about giving an example of a question, but wouldn't the
test's
> emphasis on one topic or another depend on what questions the candidate
> receives from the test engine?  The only safe way to answer our
(admittedly
> universal) curiosity is to visit these two CCO pages:
>
> R/S Exam Blueprint:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/learning_ccie_exam_blueprint09186a00
800b4c95.html
>
> What's New:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html
>
> According to the latter, all things Token Ring are gone, save for DLSW+.
>
> BJ
>
>
>
> -------Original Message-------
> From: "Clark, John"
> Sent: 11/14/02 09:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
>
> > maybe.. but I too would like to know exactly how much focus the exam has
on
> Token Ring and bridging (srb, rsrt, rsrb) and atm.. I do not think that
> violates the nda... now if you gave an example of a question - that would
> probably violate the nda.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
>
>
> Am I the only one who gets the funny feeling that such questions violate
the
> NDA?
>
> BJ
>
>
> -------Original Message-------
> From: xxxxxxxx
> Sent: 11/14/02 08:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
>
> > xxx,
> How about Token Ring and IPX. Is there as much emphasis on the RIF and etc
> as there used to be. Also- how much VoIP and MPLS should we know.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57586&t=57341
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to