-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> *** So instead of getting the EIGRP routes via Tunnel 0 inteface, I'm >> getting it via the outgoing interface (serial 0), & the IPSec still works. So what am I >> missing, and how does it make a difference if I use GRE over IPSec? I also tested >> RIPv2 & getting similar results. Hello everyone, i am new to the list, and have been studying cisco for a month now, i thought this list would be a great way of getting to know/understand the community, and would also be a great resource for me. alaerte - I have been using freebsd for a while now, and have used vpn for a little while as well. In *bsd there are a couple packages which have worked well with our cisco (3600x). For bsd i have been using racoon/zebra. Well, as i started to get into zebra, which does rip/ospf/bgp/foo.. i noticed that for a ipsec vpn, it would not take broadcast/multicast traffic over the tunnel. I then layered gre into the tunnel, and whalla, the broadcast and multicast messages were dropping over to the other side of the tunnel. I am not sure why gre takes it and ipsec doesnt. Remember, i am very new to cisco, so i am not sure how that side works. But try to use that approach, and maybe it will help you. cheers- Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 349) Beta iQA/AwUBPd0aMaUUXFhoQKvpEQLNTACfcG61THlR7HSVwFeu0gUwAb12aLUAn1Y0 FO7h6YYILpNWB20T/Yrjr1TA =vDsv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57848&t=57836 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
