It would seem you wanted to use md5 authentication but you used plain text authentication keys. In this situation - when there are no md5 authentication keys specified - I think the routers will use null key, meaning no authentication will take place...
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > check this out. > > R10 > ------ > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 222.222.222.7 1 FULL/DR 00:01:58 149.22.4.7 Serial0 > 222.222.222.11 1 FULL/DR 00:00:38 149.22.252.2 Ethernet0 > Router_10# > > interface Serial0 > ip address 149.22.4.10 255.255.255.0 > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip route-cache > ip ospf authentication message-digest > ip ospf authentication-key 7 qwertyzzyzx > > R7 > ----- > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 222.222.222.10 1 FULL/BDR 00:01:57 149.22.4.10 Serial1 > Router_7# > > interface Serial1 > ip address 149.22.4.7 255.255.255.0 > encapsulation frame-relay > no ip route-cache > ip ospf authentication message-digest > ip ospf authentication-key 7 cisco > > By my reckoning, the adjacency should NOT form because of the mismatched > passwords. Both routers have the area 0 authentication message-digest > command under the ospf process. > > This is exactly what I don't want to know at this point in my life :-) > > -- > TANSTAAFL > "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58353&t=58352 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
