it's either hardware failure on your end or circuit problems on the
local loop...

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Richard Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: high CRC and runts error [7:59049]


Hi.. I have a switch port with high CRC and runts errors with no
collision.  
The duplex and speed are match for PC and port.  Anything can do with
that?

switch5>sh int fas0/15
FastEthernet0/15 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 00d0.790c.cccf (bia
00d0.790c.cccf)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive not set
  Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 7000 bits/sec, 10 packets/sec
     2276299 packets input, 894536534 bytes
     Received 3861 broadcasts, 123535 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     136762 input errors, 6640 CRC, 6587 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 0 multicast
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     58612871 packets output, 3794454393 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59087&t=59049
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to